Wednesday 21 November 2012

CA final SA 700 TO 810




Comments

Thank u very much for great help to all students.        Satish


thanks for sharing...........                                Praveenku





CA Final Made Easy (Subject: Direct Tax)



CA Final Made Easy

Monday 9 July 2012

IFRS 5-Non Current Assets held for sale and discontinued operations

IFRS 12 - Disclosure of Interest in Other Entities

IFRS 12 - Disclosure of Interest in Other Entities is a new accounting standard coming into 
mandatory effect for periods commencing after 1 January 2013. This vid is a summary of how 
it differs from the disclosure requirements of IAS 27, 28 and 31.

Transitioning to IFRS

Asset valuation considerations when transitioning to IFRS - by Mary Balmer, CPA.

Differences between Accounting Standards & IFRS

IFRS 6 - Exploration and Evaluation of Mineral Resources

IFRS 6 - Exploration and Evaluation of Mineral Resources is an accounting standard that is core to the understanding of accounting in the mining and oil and gas industries. This video is a summary of it and how to use it effectively in accounting.

Differences between U.S. GAAP & IFRS: Property, Plant, & Equipment

IFRS 2: Share Based Payments

Hitler vs IFRS A Hilarious Video(Must Watch)

Quick Guide to IFRS and XBRL Webinar

IFRS 13-Fair Value Measurement

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in US

IFRS-Financial Instruments(IAS-32,39 & IFRS-7, IFRS-9)



The new International Financial Reporting Standard IFRS 9 Classification and measurement of financial instruments will progressively replace the current standard IAS 39. This Video describes the different 
phases of this change, focusing on risk provisions.

IAS 32 and IFRS 7 Amendments

IFRS-Questions and Answers

IFRS-Financial Instruments Background (IFRS-7)







IFRS- Basic Overview



By incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), ISAGEN has been learning to 
speak a common language that will allow the company to keep growing, to enter global markets, 
to better interact with stakeholders, and to be at the forefront of global trends to manage financial
information.

IFRS 10 - Consolidated Financial Statements

IFRS - A complete Guide

Saturday 7 July 2012

Income Tax-Salaries

Salaries Part IV

Salaries Part V

Salaries Part VI


Employer employee relationship

Salaries Part VII-Gratuity

Pension

Accounts - Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Financial Statements Part 1

Consolidated Financial Statements Part 2

Income Tax-PGBP - Chargeability - Keyman Insurance Policy

Income Tax-PGBP - Chargeability - Interest, salary etc received by partner of a firm

Income Tax-PGBP - Chargeability - Export incentives

Income Tax-PGBP - Chargeability - Benefit or perquiste

Income tax - Provision relating to revised return-Section 139(5)

Income Tax-Return Of Income

Return Of Income Part 1

Return Of Income Part 3

IncomeTax-Return of Loss - Section 139(4)

Income Tax-Return of Income - Belated Return of Income

Income Tax-Assessment procedures Part 1

Income Tax-Capital Gains Part-7

Income Tax-Capital Gains Part-6

Income Tax-Capital Gains Part-5

Income Tax-Capital Gains Part-4

Income Tax-Capital Gains Part-3

Income Tax-Capital Gains Part-2

Income Tax- Capital Gains Part-1

Income Tax-Loss from Speculation Business

Income Tax-Loss from PGBP Section 72

Income Tax-Loss from PGBP Important Concepts

Income Tax-Loss from House Property Section 71B

Income Tax-Loss from Capital Gains

Income Tax-Inter Source Adjustment Section 70

Income Tax-Inter Head Adjustment -- Section 71

Income Tax--Depreciation -- Power Generating undertakings -- Sec 32(1)(i)

Income Tax-Meaning of actual cost

Income Tax-Actual cost -- Explanation 13a2

Income Tax-Actual cost -- Explanation 13a

Income Tax-Actual cost -- Explanation 5

Income Tax-Actual cost -- Explanation 4

Income Tax-Actual cost -- Explanation 1-3

Income Tax-Actual Cost -- Transfer from Holding Co. to subsidiary and vice versa

Income Tax-Actual Cost -- Government subsidy etc

Income Tax-Actual Cost -- Demerger

Income Tax-Asset acquired by NR and used for Business purpose in India

Wealth Tax - Deemed Assets - II

Wealth Tax - Minor Child -- Including step child

Wealth Tax - Interest Of Partner Of A Firm

Wealth Tax - Example on urban land building constructed by lessee

Wealth Tax - Deemed Assets - I

Wealth Tax - Example on urban land meant for industrial purpose

Wealth Tax - Cash in Hand as an asset

Wealth Tax - Example on urban land construction not permissible

Wealth Tax - ASSET MUST BELONG TO THE ASSESSEE

Wealth Tax - Motor Car as an asset

Wealth Tax assets - Yachts, boats and aircrafts

Wealth Tax - Urban Land

Non Applicability of Wealth Tax

Wealth Tax - Charging Section

Wealth Tax - Jewellery as an asset

Computation of net Wealth

Introduction to Wealth Tax

Definitions - Wealth Tax

Wealth Tax Law

Wednesday 27 June 2012

Excise Laws- Accounting Cenvat Account

Cost Accounting-Pricing decision (Transfer Pricing)

Financial Management-Time Value of Money

Accounts-Valuation of Business

Information Systems-Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

Financial Management-Cost of Capital








How to Prepare for Final Exam

Economics-Economics Reforms

Economics-Demand Analysis

Quantitative Aptitude: Limit and Continuty

Quantitative Aptitude: Statistical description of data

Account Average Due Date

Accounts Underwriters Account

Motivation video to Prepare for Audit

Business Law Payment of Bonus Act, 1965- Basics

FM Cash Managment

Cost Accounting-Pricing Decision

Job Costing Batch Costing and unit Costing

Introduction to Computers and number system

Flow Charts

Companies Act-Basics, Definitions

ISCA BCP and DRP

Central Excise Basics, Introduction

Cost Accounting- Operation Reserach PERTCPM

CA Final Costing- Activity Based Costing

Saturday 23 June 2012

Point of Taxation


Point of Taxation Rules, 2011-Changes effect from Apr 1, 2012

1. The time period for issuance of invoice is being increased to 30 days ordinarily and 45 days for banks and financial institutions (to reconcile with the business practice of issuing monthly statement). These changes are being provided in Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules and the time period so defined is being incorporated in POT Rules.

2. In case of export of services and eight specified services provided by individuals or firms, the point of taxation is the date of payment. The special dispensation is being shifted from the POT Rules to the Service Tax Rules. This would help provide certainty in the application of rate of tax while retaining the benefit of payment of tax until payment is received.

3. In case of exporters, the period extended by the Reserve Bank of India is now explicitly included in the period for which the tax is allowed to be deferred.

4. The benefit available to individuals and firms to determine POT on the basis of date of payment for eight specified services is being extended to all services in a slightly modified form. The facility will be now available to individuals and partnership firms (including limited liability partnership) up to a turnover of Rs 50 lakh in a financial year provided the taxable turnover did not exceed this limit in the previous financial year. For computing the above limits, the turnover of the whole entity is required to be summed up and not any single registration.

5. The definition of continuous supply of service is being amended to capture the concept in a more wholesome manner, namely the recurrent nature of services and the obligation for payment periodically or from time-to-time.

6. Since the essence of the rule in case of continuous supply of service is the same as the main Rule, the separate rule for continuous supply of service [Rule 6] is 11being merged with the main rule. Moreover the provisions of rules 4 and 5 relating to changes in rates or application of tax on new services would also be applicable to continuous supply of services;

7. In case of a new levy, no tax is chargeable on services where payment has been received and invoice issued within a period of 14 days. To provide certainty, clause (b) is being amended to specify that invoice should be issued within 14 days of the date of the new levy.

8. The “date of payment” could be a subject of litigation particularly when effective rate changes. A new rule has been created: Rule 2A, keeping in view the impending change in rate effective April 1, 2012 and introduction of Negative List at a later date. In normal circumstances this date shall be the earlier of the dates of entry into books of accounts or actual credit in the bank account (when applicable).

However, when there is change in effective rate of tax or a new levy between the said two dates, the date of payment shall be the date of actual credit in the bank account, if the amount is credited through a banking instrument more than four working days after the date of such change.

9. This will have no impact where invoice is the basis for point of taxation. Thus business may be advised to take steps to deposit all advances received up to March 31, 2012 in their bank accounts suitably. Any delay in this regard will lead to charging tax at higher rate.

10. As a measure of added facilitation, an option has been provided to determine the point of taxation in respect of small advances up to Rs 1000, in excess of the amount indicated in the invoice, on the basis of invoice or completion of service rather than payment. Such provision is expected to address the accounting problems faced by service providers in telecommunications, credit card businesses who regularly receive minor excess payments from their customers.

11. A residual rule has been made by way of best judgement to handle situations where the tax-payer is unable to furnish one or more of the details needed i.e. date of payment or date of invoice or both to determine POT.

12. And lastly, the small scale exemption has also been amended recognizing that the first clearances up to Rs 10 lakhs will be in terms of invoices and not mere payments received.

13. These changes come into effect from April 1, 2012.
=========================================

Point of Taxation Rules - Applicability of New or Old rate of Service Tax
Contributed by Bimal Jain
FCA, ACS, LLB, B.Com (Hons)
CENTRAL Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) has issued clarification vides Circular No. 158/9/ 2012–ST dated. 8th May, 2012 on the rate of service tax applicable wherein invoices were raised before 1st April 2012 and the payments shall be after 1st April 2012 in case of the 8 specified services provided by individuals or proprietary firms or partnership firms, to which Rule 7 of Point of Taxation Rules 2011 was applicable and services on which tax is paid under reverse charge under section 68(2) of the Finance Act.
Issue: What would be the rate of service tax applicable wherein invoices were raised before 1st April 2012 and the payments shall be after 1st April 2012 for both cases?
Clarification: Clarification vide Circular No. 158/9/ 2012–ST provided that in case of the 8 specified services and services wherein tax is required to be paid on reverse charge by the service receiver, the point of taxation is the date of payment.
In this regard, Circular No 154/5/2012 – ST dated 28th March 2012 has also issued clarifying the same.
Thus in case of such 8 specified services provided by individuals or proprietary firms or partnership firms and in case of services wherein tax is required to be paid on reverse charge by the service receiver, if the payment is received or made, as the case maybe, on or after 1st April 2012, the service tax needs to be paid @12%.
Hence, the invoices issued before 1st April 2012 may reflect the previous rate of tax (10% and cess). In case of need, supplementary invoices may be issued to reflect the new rate of tax (12% and cess) and recover the differential amount. In case of reverse charge, the service receiver pays the tax and takes the credit on the basis of the tax payment Challan. Cenvat credit can be availed on such supplementary invoices and tax payment Challans, subject to other restrictions and conditions as provided in the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004.
Further, this clarification is important to further determine the point of taxation in case of change in effective rate of tax which is reproduced here in below:-
Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 3, the point of taxation in cases where there is a change in effective rate of tax in respect of a service, shall be determined in the following manner, namely,:-
(a) In case a taxable service has been provided before the change in effective rate of tax –
(i) Where the invoice for the same has been issued and the payment received after the change in effective rate of tax, the point of taxation shall be date of payment or issuing of invoice, whichever is earlier; or
(ii) Where the invoice has also been issued prior to change in effective rate of tax but the payment is received after the change in effective rate of tax, the point of taxation shall be the date of issuing of invoice; or
(iii) Where the payment is also received before the change in effective rate of tax, but the invoice for the same has been issued after the change in effective rate of tax, the point of taxation shall be the date of payment;
(b) In case a taxable service has been provided after the change in effective rate of tax,-
(i) Where the payment for the invoice is also made after the change in effective rate of tax but the invoice has been issued prior to the change in effective rate of tax, the point of taxation shall be the date of payment; or
(ii) Where the invoice has been issued and the payment for the invoice received before the change in effective rate of tax, the point of taxation shall be the date of receipt of payment or date of issuance of invoice, Whichever is earlier; or
(iii) Where the invoice has also been raised after the change in effective rate of tax but the payment has been received before the change in effective rate of tax, the point of taxation shall be date of issuing of invoice."
For ease of your understanding, a table is created for total understanding of Rule 4 of the Point of Taxation Rules, considering different Date of completion of Service, Date of Invoice and Date of Payment when taxable services provided before or after the change in effective rate of tax:-
Change of Rate:
1-4-2012
10%.....12%
9/4/2012 25/5/2012 12% 9/4/2012
25/5/2012 10% 28/3/2012
Date of Service
Date of Invoice
Date of Payment
Rate of Tax
POT

28/3/2012
9/4/2012
25/5/2012
12%
9/4/2012
28/3/2012
25/5/2012
10%
28/3/2012
9/4/2012
26/3/2012
10%
26/3/2012
10/4/2012
28/3/2012
25/5/2012
12%
25/5/2012
28/3/2012
16/3/2012
10%
16/3/2012
9/4/2012
28/3/2012
12%
9/4/2012

Open Issues even after clarifications:-
++ Is interest payable on differential payment of Service tax....answer seems yes, but why said Circular is Silent.
++ Moot Question -> a) what is the taxable event under service tax? Relevant for the applicability of Rule
4(a)(i) of the Point of Taxation Rules 2011.
• Can there be service tax even before rendering the services?
• Why new rate would be applicable when service is rendered before change in effective rate of Service tax?
• 'Tax on services Vs. Tax on Advances'
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "All India Federation of Tax Practitioners Vs. UOI 2007-149-
SC-ST” held that “tax on things or goods can only be with reference to a taxable event” and same contention is upheld also in the case of "Association of Leasing & Financial Service Companies vs. UOI 2010-87-SCST-LB" that Taxable Event is Rendering of Service.

================================================================

Accrual system of taxation in Service Tax


Learning Objectives
1. Shift from cash system to accrual system – changes in provision of law 
2. Meaning of Point of Taxation
3. Applicability of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011
4. Determination of Point of Taxation under different situations
5. Impact of Point of Taxation on taxable event in service tax
6. Applicability of accrual system to Credit of Service Tax
7. Self Adjustment of Service Tax


Accrual System – Changes in provision of law
Notification No. 03/2011-ST                


Amend Service Tax Rules, 1994
Amendments made
Amendments made
1. Rule 6(1)
2. First proviso to Rule 6(1)
3. Second proviso to Rule 6(1)       omitted
4. Third proviso to Rule 6(1)
5. Rule 5B                                        added
                                These amendments have following effect.
Liability to pay tax shall be determined on
date when services are deemed to be
provided.                                                                                                                 And then following came into existence                                                                                                       Point of Taxation Rules, 2011

Friday 22 June 2012

Export of Services


To understand this concept first we will go through the exact language of the law. Don’t worry about complexity of the language of the law, later we will try to simplify the language through simple explanations and articles. Idea is to first grasp what is law and then interpretating the same and not to miss out anything.

Below is the language of Law
Very important: Below rules are amended up to date by different notifications were issued from time to time(Total 7 notifications for amendment in such rules). We don't need to see old notifications, reason is that the same have been already incorporated in EXPORT OF SERVICE RULES, 2005, thus the present law in relation to rule is in its current form so we need to know only what is current and what is applicable from now onwards i.e. changes have prospective effects not retrospective effects. But for past cases we need to check what was relevant at that time.


=========================================
EXPORT OF SERVICE RULES, 2005

[Notification NO. 9/2005-S.T., dated 03.03.2005 
as amended by 
Notification NO. 13/2006-S.T., dated 19.04.2006, 
02/2007-S.T., dated 01.03.2007, 
30/2007-S.T., dated 22.05.2007, 
05/2008-S.T., dated 01.03.2008, 
20/2008-S.T., dated 10.05.2008,
38/2009-S.T., dated 23.09.2009, 
06/2010-S.T., dated 27.02.2010,

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 93 & 94 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules, namely:-
1.  Short title and commencement.-
(1) These rules may be called the Export of Services Rules, 2005.
(2) They shall come into force on the 15th day of March, 2005.
 
2.  Definitions. - In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires,-
(a) “Act” means the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994);
(b) “input” shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (k) of rule 2 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004;
(c) “input service” shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (l) of rule 2 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
 
3. Export of taxable service. – (1) Export of taxable services shall, in relation to  taxable services‚–
(i)  specified in sub-clauses (d), (m), (p), (q), (v), (zzq), (zzza), (zzzb), (zzzc), (zzzh), (zzzr), (zzzy), (zzzz), (zzzza) & (zzzzm) of clause (105) of section 65 of the Act, be provision of such services as are provided in  relation to an  immovable property situated outside India;
(ii) specified in sub-clauses (a), (f), (h), (i), (j), (l), [*  * *], (n), (o), [*  * *], (w), (x), (y), (z), (zb), (zc), (zi), (zj), (zn), (zo), (zq), (zr), (zt), (zu), (zv),(zw), (zza), (zzc), (zzd), (zzf), (zzg), (zzh), (zzi), (zzl), (zzm), (zzn), (zzo), (zzp), (zzs), (zzt), (zzv), (zzw), (zzx), (zzy), (zzzd), (zzze), (zzzf), (zzzp), (zzzzg), (zzzzh), (zzzzi), (zzzzk) and (zzzzl) of clause (105) of section 65 of the Act, be provision of such services as are performed outside  India:
    Provided that where such taxable service is partly performed outside India, it shall be treated as performed Outside India;
Provided further that where the taxable services referred to in sub-clauses (zzg), (zzh) and (zzi) of clause (105) of section 65 of the Act, are provided in relation to any goods or material or any immovable property, as the case may be, situated outside India at the time of provision of service, through internet or an electronic network including a computer network or any other means, then such taxable service, whether or not performed outside India, shall 
be treated as the taxable service performed outside India;
(iii) specified in clause (105) of section 65 of the Act, but excluding‚–
  (a) sub-clauses (zzzo) and (zzzv);
 (b) those specified in clause (i) of this rule except when the provision of taxable services specified in sub-clauses (d), (zzzc), (zzzr) and (zzzzm) does not relate to immovable property; and
  (c) those specified in clause (ii) of this rule,

when provided in relation to business or commerce, be provision of such services to a recipient located outside India  and when provided otherwise, be provision of such services to a recipient located outside India at the time of provision of such service:
Provided that where such recipient has commercial establishment or any office relating thereto, in India, such taxable services provided shall be treated as export of service only when order for provision of such service is made from any of his commercial establishment or office located outside India:
 
Provided further that where the taxable service referred to in sub-clause (zzzzj) of clause (105) of section 65 of the Act is provided to a recipient located outside India, then such taxable service shall be treated as export  of taxable service subject to the condition that the tangible goods supplied for use are located outside India during the period of use of such tangible goods by such recipient.
(2) The provision of any taxable service specified in sub-rule (1) shall be treated as export of service when the following conditions are satisfied, namely:-
(a) [* * * ]
(b) payment for such service is received by the service provider in convertible foreign exchange.
 
Explanation.- For the purposes of this rule “India” includes the installation structures and vessels located in the continental shelf of India and the exclusive economic zone of India, for the purposes of prospecting or extraction or production of mineral oil and natural gas and supply thereof.
   
4. Export without payment of service tax. - Any service, which is taxable under clause (105) of section 65 of the Act, may be exported without payment of service tax.

5. Rebate of service tax. - Where any taxable service is exported, the Central Government may, by notification, grant rebate of service tax paid on such taxable service or service tax or duty paid on input services or inputs, as the case may be, used in providing such taxable service and the rebate shall be subject to such conditions or limitations, if any, and fulfillment of such procedure, as may be specified in the notification.

=========================================
Now, let understand the law in simple language by help of following articles and explanations.

Implications of service tax on export of services

S Madhavan / New Delhi November 06, 2006 


As is by now well known, the service tax, which has been in force in India for more than a decade, is intended to operate as a destination based consumption tax.

Consequently, services will be taxed at the place of consumption and, as a corollary, not taxed from where they are exported. Therefore, export of services from India are intended to be exempt from domestic service tax law.

In order to bring about this dispensation, the Government of India introduced the Export of Services Rules, 2005, with effect from March 15, 2005. However, it was not as though that export of services from India were taxed prior to that date.

The erstwhile exemption from the tax which was prevalent prior to the above date did not however lay down rules to determine as to what constituted export of services from India, and was based on the sole condition of receipt of inward remittances of non repatriable convertible foreign exchange.

Thus, the above Rules laid down, for the first time, elaborate criteria for the determination of export of services, besides laying down other conditions, for the exemption from the service tax.

The Rules enable the exporter of services to either not charge service tax on such exports or to discharge the service tax thereon and claim a rebate/refund of the tax.

In both situations, provisions have been made to ensure that the exporter of such services is able to offset/obtain a refund of the service taxes paid on input services/goods used in the provision of the exported services.

As regards the rules for determination of exports, a three-part categorisation of services has been done. The first category relates to a set of 10 services which will be treated as exported from India if the immovable property to which these services relate are situated outside India. The second category pertains to those services which require physical performance and the Rules state that these services will be treated as exports, if the services are either wholly or partly performed outside India. A list of 50 different services has been identified under this category. The third and final category is with regard to services other than those referred to above, constituting 40 in number, which will be treated as exports, if the service is both delivered and used outside India and payment for such services is received by the service provider in convertible foreign exchange.

The Export of Services Rules underwent changes in June 2005 and April 2006, pursuant to the Finance Act 2006, as a result of which the benefit of exemption from the service tax would be available only if the twin conditions of delivery and use outside India and receipt of payment for such services in convertible foreign exchange are met.

It can thus be seen that the erstwhile condition of inward remittances of convertible foreign exchange continue to remain as an essential condition. However, the significant additional condition is that the services should be delivered and used outside India.

This leads us straight to the biggest issue surrounding the determination of export of services, in the absence of rules for determining the fact of delivery and use of services outside India, when provided from India.

The underlined expression is important since the Rules can only come into play if such services are provided from or rendered from India. If the services are altogether performed from outside the country, they would not be covered under the ambit of Indian service tax law at all.

The absence of rules to determine the delivery and use of services outside India has created numerous difficulties for a variety of service providers/services.

Given that services are typically transient in nature and also intangible in character, formidable semantic difficulties arise in determining how and when the services are supposedly delivered to a recipient outside India and also how and when such a service, which is delivered outside India, is also put to use outside India.

Broadly speaking, it could be said that if the service is executory in nature, it will be delivered and used only at the place where it is performed and if the service is advisory in nature, it will be delivered at the place where the recipient, to whom such services are rendered, is located.

However, these broad rules do not clinch the issue in a variety of circumstances where the services are quasi executory and quasi advisory in nature and it becomes imperative in such situations to apply the ‘essential characteristic’ test to determine the delivery and use of the service outside India, in order to qualify for the exemption.

The other difficulty related to the above is that the service could ostensibly be used, subsequent to its delivery, on a repeated basis and such use could conceivably be both outside and within the country. The question that arises therefore is whether the word ‘used’ is limited to the immediate use or could it extend to subsequent uses as well.

Several similar and associated difficulties have arisen in specific situations and the absence of clear rules for determination of exports has caused significant concern. An idea of the seriousness of the question can be gauged from the fact that several of the activities/services that are typically performed by the IT and IT enabled services sector, including call centre and back office operations, could potentially not qualify as exports, so as to be eligible for the exemption from the service tax.

Given that India is a significant provider of such services to the wider world, it will be self defeating and entirely negative for India’s aspirations, should there be a tax cost of 12.24% on the value of such services.

The second connected problem is with regard to the inability of service providers from India to recoup all input taxes, upon their exporting such services. As indicated earlier, the input taxes can either be set off against output taxes or refunded in cash.

Typically, for exporters of services, such offsets are not possible and hence cash refunds are the only means of recouping input taxes. For all those who are in the know, the fact that till date there is not a single instance of a refund being granted by the authorities to any service provider in India is an indication of the difficulties faced.

While the rules for grant of rebates/refunds for such exports have been in place for more than a year and have also been subsequently liberalised, it is a fact that till date no refunds have been granted.

In conclusion, it is fair to suggest that there has been significant progress in service taxation in India in terms of evolving a comprehensive set of guidelines in the form of the Export of Services Rules.

However, it is equally true that in the absence of rules of determination of the delivery and use of the service outside the country, service exporters continue to face formidable difficulties in determining whether their exports are free from service tax. Clear rules are therefore urgently required to do away with the ambiguities in service tax law relating to exports.

(The author is Leader, Indirect Tax Practice, PricewaterhouseCoopers)